<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front Page</title> <atom:link href="http://geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/</link> <description>Geek Technica</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <item><title>By: Tweets that mention Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front Page &#124; Geek Technica -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/comment-page-1/#comment-3977</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front Page &#124; Geek Technica -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:04:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/#comment-3977</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by news.yc Popular, Marco Tabini, Greg Andrews, Posts Google, uberChick(*KaityGB); and others. uberChick(*KaityGB); said: Wonders of wonders. LOL Yea, &amp; no one saw it coming. Google Removed Ad-Block from their Extension Gallery&#039;s Front Page http://bit.ly/cGuTaD [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by news.yc Popular, Marco Tabini, Greg Andrews, Posts Google, uberChick(*KaityGB); and others. uberChick(*KaityGB); said: Wonders of wonders. LOL Yea, &amp; no one saw it coming. Google Removed Ad-Block from their Extension Gallery&#39;s Front Page <a
href="http://bit.ly/cGuTaD" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cGuTaD</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pavel</title><link>http://geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/comment-page-1/#comment-3859</link> <dc:creator>Pavel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:03:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/#comment-3859</guid> <description>On my second refresh I got AdThwart in the popular links, as you can plainly see:
http://i.imgur.com/GOS81.pngI personally don&#039;t mind that they are rotating the popular extensions... if an extensions is so popular probably means that probably I already have it and it wouldn&#039;t hurt to show me some other relatively popular extensions.Another question is why it defaulted to the French version of the web-site???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my second refresh I got AdThwart in the popular links, as you can plainly see:<br
/> <a
href="http://i.imgur.com/GOS81.png" rel="nofollow">http://i.imgur.com/GOS81.png</a></p><p>I personally don&#8217;t mind that they are rotating the popular extensions&#8230; if an extensions is so popular probably means that probably I already have it and it wouldn&#8217;t hurt to show me some other relatively popular extensions.</p><p>Another question is why it defaulted to the French version of the web-site???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230; &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</title><link>http://geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/comment-page-1/#comment-3856</link> <dc:creator>Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230; &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:01:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/#comment-3856</guid> <description>[...] original here: Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230;   Share and [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] original here: Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230;   Share and [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230; &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</title><link>http://geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/comment-page-1/#comment-3855</link> <dc:creator>Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230; &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:01:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/#comment-3855</guid> <description>[...] post: Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230;   Share and [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230;   Share and [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: uberVU - social comments</title><link>http://geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/comment-page-1/#comment-3847</link> <dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:13:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/#comment-3847</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;This post was mentioned on Twitter by geektechnica: Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front Page http://bit.ly/cSJ3zo...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p><p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by geektechnica: Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front Page <a
href="http://bit.ly/cSJ3zo.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cSJ3zo..</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230; Contact</title><link>http://geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/comment-page-1/#comment-3845</link> <dc:creator>Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230; Contact</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:28:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/#comment-3845</guid> <description>[...] here to see the original:  Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230; Tags: chrome-extension, client, feminine-wardrobe, few-months, flattering, idad, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to see the original:  Google Removes Ad blocking Extensions from Extension Gallery Front &#8230; Tags: chrome-extension, client, feminine-wardrobe, few-months, flattering, idad, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: V-2</title><link>http://geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/comment-page-1/#comment-3841</link> <dc:creator>V-2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:57:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/#comment-3841</guid> <description>Another issue though is that the existing adblockers for Chrome are not very good.  I tried them one by one and I wasn&#039;t impressed. For example AdThwart blocks Youtube videos... AdBlock (my ultimate choice) works fine but it doesn&#039;t really block ads - it just hides them (so you still waste time and bandwidth loading them), etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another issue though is that the existing adblockers for Chrome are not very good.  I tried them one by one and I wasn&#8217;t impressed. For example AdThwart blocks Youtube videos&#8230; AdBlock (my ultimate choice) works fine but it doesn&#8217;t really block ads &#8211; it just hides them (so you still waste time and bandwidth loading them), etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: V-2</title><link>http://geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/comment-page-1/#comment-3840</link> <dc:creator>V-2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:50:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/#comment-3840</guid> <description>Well personally I don&#039;t mind. The more people do NOT block ads, the better for those who do. Advertisers keep on paying for the websites we visit and seldom use tricks meant to bypass adblockers. Also as long as Chromium is open source, Google cannot just go ahead and simply disable adblocking in the browser. And if they do, I won&#039;t use Chromium anymore and that&#039;s it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well personally I don&#8217;t mind. The more people do NOT block ads, the better for those who do. Advertisers keep on paying for the websites we visit and seldom use tricks meant to bypass adblockers. Also as long as Chromium is open source, Google cannot just go ahead and simply disable adblocking in the browser. And if they do, I won&#8217;t use Chromium anymore and that&#8217;s it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dmitry Chestnykh</title><link>http://geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/comment-page-1/#comment-3828</link> <dc:creator>Dmitry Chestnykh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:15:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektechnica.com/2010/02/google-removes-ad-blocking-extensions-from-extension-gallery-front-page/#comment-3828</guid> <description>It seems they are just rotating the results in &quot;Popular&quot; column. Ad blockers are still there: http://i.imgur.com/HT1R9.png</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems they are just rotating the results in &#8220;Popular&#8221; column. Ad blockers are still there: <a
href="http://i.imgur.com/HT1R9.png" rel="nofollow">http://i.imgur.com/HT1R9.png</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via geektech.geektech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: geektechnica.com @ 2010-07-30 10:20:21 -->